Technology not only spread to cities like Stockholm. But also changed the church, monasteries, political movements and warfare..

Gutenberg’s press , with loose metal types that could be re-set and reused, meant two crucial things: first, that copying texts became faster and cheaper, and second, that the spread of printed material broke the limitations of the previous handwritten manuscripts.

Initially, it was a small revolution against the old monopoly of written culture – the church’s monastic environments and writing workshops – and there already lies the seed for the greater leap.

Research shows that book prices fell slowly after Gutenberg’s time – by perhaps 1.7% per year over a century – making books more accessible to wider groups.

Watch English-language video:

In Stockholm

For Sweden and the Nordic countries, printing played a slow but significant role in the development of cities and culture. The first printed book in Sweden is Dialogus creaturarum moralizatus, printed in Stockholm on December 20, 1483 by the German printer Johann Snell , who worked at the monastery on the island of Gråmunkeholmen (now Riddarholmen). Printing works in monasteries such as Vadstena Monastery also operated – in this case with printed liturgical texts around 1495.

Although printing technology arrived relatively early in Stockholm, establishment was slow – again, research indicates that Nordic spread took time, but once it took hold, new networks for bookselling and the exchange of ideas were opened.

The state authorities came to realize early on the importance of control over freedom of the press – for example, during the reign of Gustav Vasa, royal printing houses and control mechanisms were established and pre-printed texts were printed.

The fact that Stockholm – the capital and political center – was the first to have printing presses meant that the city became a node for the dissemination of religious texts, administrative documents and, later, political material.

Church, monastery and religion

Before the printing press, manuscript production was largely a monastic and church-driven project: monks copied the Bible, legends of saints, and theological works by hand. The printing press fundamentally changed this. Suddenly, Bibles, sermon collections, and other religious texts could be distributed in large editions, and in the vernacular—undermining the church’s previous control over writing and interpretation.

In monasteries and churches, therefore, printed books began to replace handwriting as the norm – not only technically but symbolically: the priest no longer had to read from a handwritten book but could refer to a printed version that the congregation could also take part in. This shift also meant an intellectual transition: oral culture was gradually replaced by reading and reflecting readers.

For the monasteries, it became a double movement: on the one hand, an opportunity to produce and disseminate their own writings, on the other hand, a challenge, since through printed books laypeople could gain direct access to theological and biblical texts without intermediaries.

Political influence

The printing press quickly became a tool for communicating ideas and exerting political influence. In Europe, it contributed to the spread of Reformation ideas – partly through writings, brochures and pamphlets – which brought religion and politics together in new ways.

In Sweden, and in Stockholm, printing therefore also became important for state power and for political movements – for example through the publication of laws, royal decrees, and later newspapers and magazines.

The printed word became a means of either consolidating power or challenging it. During wars and conflicts – think of the different camps of the Reformation and Counter-Reformation – printed writings became ammunition. Literary propaganda, tied to matters of faith as well as to the interests of nation-states, showed that technology conveyed not only peaceful thoughts but also battle cries.

The printed word shaped a new public sphere – where citizens could take part in ideas, debates, and thereby participate in politics in a different way than before.

• The printing press enabled the mass production of pamphlets, news, political manifestos – providing new tools for the dissemination of ideas and power. In famous cases, the printing press helped spread the ideas of the Reformation and humanism.
• In Sweden: during the 18th century, freedom of the press emerged (the Freedom of the Press Act from 1766 ) as a direct result of printed publications gaining greater importance in politics.
• In war and diplomacy, printed news and bulletins became important. Early on – as early as the 17th century – there were examples of weekly newspapers from the post office in Stockholm.
• Control of the printing press therefore became a means of power: the state and the church realized that whoever controlled printing could also influence public opinion and thus politics and war/peace decisions. In Sweden this meant that printing houses were closed at certain times, privileges were given, and censorship was introduced.

We can therefore say that the printing press created a new public space: where ideas, writings and political messages could circulate faster, further and with greater effect than before. Competition between printing houses became in itself a factor in how ideologies were spread and reinforced.

A mirror for our times

Gutenberg’s press was not just a technical innovation. It was a catalyst for a cultural and structural transformation: in church and monastery, in the city’s public life – not least here in Stockholm – and in the political conflicts and power struggles that followed.

Just as in the 19th-century media revolution , where new machines and mass production changed the role of newspapers, the Gutenberg printing press did its work in the 15th and 16th centuries: it did not destroy the old structures out of the blue, but it opened the way for something new – a world of readers, of printed thoughts, of ideas that spread beyond the wall.

For Stockholm, this meant that the city became an actor in the spread of printing – not just a recipient but a producer – and thereby a place where the printed word could be both sacred and political.

The Internet of its time

The printing press broke the church and monasteries’ monopoly on the text — the internet breaks the monopoly on the word of traditional media houses and editorial offices. Before Gutenberg, knowledge and theological interpretations were reserved for the clergy. After him, anyone could read the Bible for themselves .

Similarly, the internet has made it possible for anyone to publish — blogs, podcasts, and social media have replaced the pulpit and the printing press as platforms for ideas.
Both times, there has been a kind of democratization of the word , but also an information chaos.

When Luther translated the Bible into the vernacular and printed it, the church’s linguistic monopoly was shattered.
When bloggers, activists, and citizen journalists began posting online, governments and editors lost their privilege of interpretation.

In both cases, the authorities responded with attempts at control: the church introduced censorship and indexes of banned books; states today try to regulate social media, control algorithms or close platforms. But just as in the 16th century, control is always one step behind technology.

The printing press made national languages, religious movements, and political parties possible. The Internet creates similar “communities of opinion”—digital congregations, subcultures, and ideological echo chambers.

Both media give people a sense of belonging to something bigger – but also the risk of division, radicalization and conflict. The Reformation pamphlet wars in the 16th century had the same basic mechanics as today’s Twitter storms: quick words, short messages, moral indignation.

---

/ By Ingemar Lindmark

Quiz: The printing press – the Internet of its time

Part 1: General understanding

1. Which invention is Johannes Gutenberg behind?
   a) The steam engine
   b) The printing press with movable type
   c) The compass
   d) The telescope
2. What was the major difference between Gutenberg’s printing technology and earlier manuscript production?
   a) It made books more beautiful but slower to produce
   b) It made copying faster and cheaper
   c) It only allowed religious texts
   d) It could only be used in monasteries
3. In which city was the first book printed in Sweden?
   a) Uppsala
   b) Stockholm
   c) Vadstena
   d) Gothenburg
4. What was the name of the first printed book in Sweden (1483)?
   a) Gustav Vasa’s Bible
   b) Luther’s Bible
   c) Dialogus creaturarum moralizatus
   d) Biblica Suecana
5. Who printed the first Swedish book?
   a) Olaus Petri
   b) Johann Snell
   c) Gustav Vasa
   d) Martin Luther

---

Part 2: Church and monastery

6. True or False: Before the printing press, almost all books were produced by monks in monasteries.
   ☐ True
   ☐ False
7. How did the printing press change the role of the church in the dissemination of knowledge?
   a) The church gained greater control over texts
   b) The church lost its monopoly on writing and interpretation
   c) Monasteries began to produce more manuscripts
   d) The Bible was banned in printed form
8. What symbolic change occurred in the church thanks to printed books?
   a) Priests began to read silently
   b) Priests could read from printed texts that the congregation could also own
   c) The Bible became secret
   d) Psalms disappeared from the church service

---

Part 3: Politics and society

9. How did Gustav Vasa use the printing press during his reign?
   a) To spread propaganda and royal decrees
   b) To produce novels
   c) To promote German literature
   d) He banned printing altogether
10. In which year was Sweden’s first freedom of the press decree issued?
    a) 1483
    b) 1541
    c) 1645
    d) 1766
11. What was Post- och Inrikes Tidningar?
    a) A religious pamphlet
    b) Sweden’s first official newspaper
    c) A censorship list
    d) A church calendar
12. Why did the state and church try to control printing presses?
    a) To protect the environment
    b) To avoid piracy
    c) To influence public opinion and political decisions
    d) To preserve the language

---

Part 4: The printing press and the Internet – parallels

13. What similarity does the text point out between the printing press and the internet?
    a) Both created new ways to transport goods
    b) Both democratized the word and knowledge
    c) Both were completely controlled by the state
    d) Both were invented in Germany
14. How did the authorities react to these media upheavals (printing press / internet)?
    a) Through censorship and attempts at control
    b) By abolishing schools
    c) By banning all communication
    d) By ignoring technology
15. The text is similar to the Reformation’s pamphlet wars with today’s social media. What is the point of the comparison?
    ✎ Write a short answer:
    → _________________________________________________

---